Americans Are Dreamers Too

Americans on the political Left in America are very concerned for the dreams of people who have come to America illegally. They are especially concerned for the dreams of those who were smuggled into America illegally as children. They have a special name for them, they call them “Dreamers.”

It is truly sad for these people who were brought to America very young and who grew up in America. Most probably have considerably less ties to their parent’s native country than their parents. They were too  young for me to consider them criminals, but someone who brought them was a criminal, a person who deliberately broke U.S. law to be here.

I use the word “illegal” because I want to stress that at the root of this problem there is always a crime.

Those on the Left would like to abolish the laws that make it a crime to enter the U.S. at will without any control. They would like to abolish ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). They would like for it to be legal for anyone who can get to the U.S. border to cross over into the U.S. without any checks on their health, criminal background, or likely ability to be employed and not become an immediate burden on U.S. taxpayers.

What would be the likely consequences of enacting “open borders,” allowing anyone who wanted to come to America and could somehow manage to get here? What would be the  consequences to  the dreams of all the Americans and their children, who are already here legally?

Let’s do a little math. The population density of Mexico City is calculated to be 15,600 people per square mile. If you have ever been to Mexico City you might have noticed that a large part of it is a literal slum compared to the standards many Americans are used to.

Mexico City
Mexico City, high rise buildings, freeways, and slums. Is this the future of America?

According to the U.S. Census Bureau 62.7% of the U.S. population lives in cities on 3.5% of the land in the U.S. That 3.5% comes to about 123,616 square miles so the calculated average population density in those cities is 1,657 persons per square mile. It is considerably higher in some of the larger cities and less so in smaller cities, but that is the overall average. It a heck of a lot less than 15,600 per square mile in Mexico City.

Considering that the vast majority of people who will come to America legally, or illegally will live in those cities, how many people would need to come to America to make our cities like Mexico City in the picture above? According to my calculations a little over 500 million.

What would the political consequences be if that many poor and downtrodden people came to America? Obviously the  Democratic Party would have an enormous advantage. All these people would need to be on many forms of assistance, perhaps for a long time. They would look to the Democrats to guarantee that and the elite of the Democratic Party would be glad to accommodate them. A few Republicans might get elected in the hinterlands but they would be as powerless as Republicans are currently in California (only less so).

The real motivation of the elite politicians is political power. Period. How you live (in “flyover country”) is of little importance to them. As long as they can be at the top of the heap as elected politicians they don’t really care how those on the bottom of the heap live.

Want proof of that? Look at cities like Detroit and Chicago in the U.S. that have been run by Democratic politicians for generations. Look at the crime and poverty in the inner cities run by Democrats. Look at the lives of black Americans living in those inner cities and still voting Democratic.

Do I think 500 million immigrants are likely? I have no idea but we do know that many millions have come to America illegally facing many real hazards including Mexican criminals  and the harsh and dangerous landscapes of the southwest border where more than a few have died. The Border Patrol find their bodies all the time.

So what if we now advertise you can walk in openly and legally and probably get immediate government assistance? 500 million people is about 6.5% of the world’s total population. How many poor people around the world would sell everything they own to come here if they could, and especially if they were guaranteed assistance and benefits when they arrived?

But even if not 500 million, what would 50 million or 100 million or 200 million do? At some point there would be enough to guarantee the Democrats could run things into the ground all over America the same way they have run cities like Detroit into the ground. How many remember that Ronald Reagan was a Republican governor of California at one time? That is one state that clearly shows what millions of illegal immigrants can do to change the political landscape.

So how about the dreams of Americans then? How about American Dreamers that would like to go to college and have the good life? The Democrats would probably want more “diversity” in American colleges so a lot more kids from immigrant backgrounds would almost certainly be getting more of those slots for higher education. Democrats would be telling your kids they ought to “check their privilege” when they don’t get into a good college, or maybe any college.

Are you willing to give up your dreams, and your children’s dreams to all the Dreamers in the world who would like to come here and start reaping all the benefits (many that you will have to pay for in taxes)?

Think on it. Is it too selfish to want our kids to have a chance for their dreams, the American Dreamers? As Americans we need to push our politicians hard to solve the problems with illegal immigration. If not our children will often be dreaming in vain.

We may not send all these kids back who were brought to America illegally but we really need to turn off the spigot of continued illegal immigration. The future of American Dreamers depends on it.

 

How Trump Changed the Courts in 2017

President Donald Trump and Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch
President Donald Trump and Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch

How Trump Changed the Courts in 2017

 Even before he was president, Donald Trump was clear about how he would prioritize putting constitutionalists on the courts.

And now, at the end of 2017, we can see how his presidency is already having an effect on the courts.

So how has the president done in his first year in office in terms of making good on that promise? Quite well indeed.

While the crowning achievement of the year was clearly the confirmation of Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, it is worth celebrating the fact that the Senate confirmed 12 circuit court judges this year—the largest number of appellate judges confirmed during the first year of any president in history (beating out John Kennedy and Richard Nixon by one).  

-John G. Malcolm, READ MORE at The Daily Signal


Trump’s Tax Reform Will Benefit Middle Class More Than Wealthy

 Most of the gifts exchanged at this time of year are opened on Christmas Day. But this time around, a big one arrived a few days early: the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

You’d never know that if you listen to the grinches in the so-called mainstream media, of course. They poured the usual amount of derision on it, insisting that it’s nothing more than a robber-baron’s roundup—a grab bag of goodies for the rich and no one else.

“A Win for the Wealthy, the Entitled and the Irresponsible,” read the headline of The Washington Post’s editorial. The New York Times, meanwhile, went with “Tax Bill Lets Trump and Republicans Feather Their Own Nests.”

Other media outlets followed suit, venting outrage at what they insist is nothing more than a sellout and a scam.

It isn’t. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act isn’t perfect, but it offers real tax relief to Americans up and down the income scale. President Donald Trump’s opponents are so fixed in their class-warfare ways that they seem oblivious to how beneficial it will really be, to ordinary workers and to the economy as a whole.  

-Ed Feulner, READ MORE at The Daily Signal


Passing Tax Reform Offers Republicans Another Shot to Repeal Obamacare

 Republicans have another shot to repeal Obamacare in 2018 after passing the historic Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Republicans passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December, which repealed Obamacare’s individual mandate. After passing the tax reform legislation, Republicans have differed on whether to pivot to infrastructure or entitlement reform.

Speaker Paul Ryan signaled that next year he wants to tackle entitlement reform, while Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell suggested that Republicans should move on from repealing Obamacare. Republicans will only have a one-seat majority in the Senate in 2018, which will make more contentious issues such as welfare reform and Obamacare repeal less politically viable, although some conservatives have argued that Republicans should focus on repealing Obamacare.  

-Sean Moran, READ MORE at Breitbart


December 28, 2017 InAmerica

DACA Amnesty Would Cost $26 Billion

CBO Report: DACA Amnesty Would Cost American Taxpayers $26 Billion

Giving amnesty to millions of illegal aliens who are covered and eligible for the President Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program would cost American taxpayers a total of $26 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

The DREAM Act, which is the most expansive amnesty being considered in Congress, would give potentially 3.5 million illegal aliens who are shielded from deportation by DACA and those eligible for DACA a pathway to U.S. citizenship.

-John Binder, READ MORE at Breitbart News


DACA Amnesty Chain Migration Would Exceed Four Years of U.S. Births

NEW YORK CITY, New York — The Democrats’ draft Dream Act amnesty would likely add as many chain-migration foreigners to the United States population as are added by the total number of Americans who are born in four years’ time.

As House and Senate Republicans, Democrats, the big business lobby, the cheap labor industry, and the open borders lobby have teamed up to push an amnesty for potentially millions of illegal aliens who are enrolled and eligible for the President Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, the impact the move would have on Americans would be likely unprecedented.

-John Binder, READ MORE at Breitbart News


WSJ: There’s Mounting Evidence of 2016 Election Meddling Coming From the FBI

There is something rotten at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. I mean all of this is just absurd. We have two FBI agents texting one another, one of which is having an extramarital affair with the other, cryptically talking about “insurance” against a Trump presidency. That text between these two agents was delivered on August 15, 2016. You also have Andrew Weissmann, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s top lieutenant, voicing praise for then-acting Attorney General Sally Yates for refusing to enact President Trump’s executive order on immigration, which got her fired. Then, there’s another DOJ official, Bruce Ohr, who was demoted for meeting the authors of the infamous and unverified Trump dossier, Fusion GPS; Ohr’s wife, Nellie, worked for that firm during the 2016 election. If there is nothing rotten at the FBI, then it’s credibility is definitely in question, something that The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board mentioned in their op-ed about this mess.

-Matt Vespa, READ MORE at Townhall


Decemember 16, 2017 In America