Universal Background Checks Revisited

I am a long time NRA member and I would support universal background checks for all firearms purchases if it was done the right way. My idea of the “right way” should be acceptable to most gun owners and I would hope it would also be supported by many non-gunowners concerned about firearms ending up in the wrong hands.

For those who may not be familiar with current firearms laws in the United States, almost all firearms sales through licensed dealers must be approved through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). One exception that I know of is that in Texas if you have a license to carry a firearm (concealed carry permit) the dealer can accept that without going through NICS. A person in Texas with a license to carry has already undergone a far more extensive background check than is done by NICS.

Universal background check was used to buy this gun
The S&W model handgun I can carry in Texas because I have a license

The problem in the eyes of many is the sale of firearms between private individuals that do not go through the NICS system. It is debatable just how problematic these sales really are and how much they really contribute to crime and gun violence in the U.S. Nevertheless I would like to suggest a system that could make universal backgrounds checks a reality for all legal sales.

One problem many gun owners see with most proposals for universal background checks is the temptation of government to create a database of gun owners that could be possibly used in the future to implement massive firearms confiscation (like what happened in Australia, so don’t tell gun owners they are being overly paranoid). The system I propose would help protect against that possibility.

Why not do a NICS background check on every American when they get a driver’s license or a government id? If the check passed then put a code on the back of the driver’s license indicating the individual can legally buy a firearm.

Now when you go into a store and want to buy a firearm you present your driver’s license and the dealer turns it over and looks at the back to confirm you have already been checked. If I, as a private individual, want to sell a firearm then I ask the purchaser to show me his or her driver’s license. Simple as that. (Note that this also helps me not violate Federal law which prohibits me from selling a firearm to someone who is not a resident of my state.)

The police conducting occasional “sting operations” to find people who don’t check the license in private sales could lead to a high degree of compliance among citizens who have no criminal intent. For those with criminal intentions laws are pretty useless. That is why we have prisons.

The basic idea is that the check is done routinely for almost everyone. When NICS gets a request all they know is that someone is applying for a driver’s license or id. They have no idea if the person will use that license in the future to buy a firearm.

Sometimes people do things that should cancel their right to buy a firearm. Not a big problem with this system. Take a away their license or id and give them a new one without the enabling code. Again, a very simple procedure.

Also obviously there should be strong provisions for a person to challenge the determination that takes away their right to buy firearms. Rights should not be suspended arbitrarily but only when based on objective and well defined criteria. There must be due process of law.

There are probably details in this plan for universal background checks that I haven’t thought of, but I do think the basic premise is sound. The most important part of such a plan is that it could appeal to a lot of people, both those who own firearms and those who do not.

 

Don’t Be A Dick

Dick’s Sporting Goods, also doing business as “Field & Stream,”  seems very determined to alienate a sizable portion of their clientele. The NRA-ILA (National Rifle Association – Institute for Legislative Action) summed it up pretty well:

We have recently been reporting on the bizarre anti-gun activism of one of the nation’s larger firearm retailers, Dick’s Sporting Goods and its affiliated Field & Stream stores. First, the company announced it would stop selling most centerfire semi-automatic rifles at its stores, carry only limited capacity magazines for semi-automatic guns, and ban firearm sales to certain legally eligible adults. It then took the further step of declaring it would destroy its inventory of the newly-restricted firearms at company expense. And if that weren’t enough, the news also recently broke that the company had hired expensive D.C. lobbyists to push for gun control measures on Capitol Hill.

Dick’s, in other words, was positioning itself as a rising star in the field of corporate gun control activism, in obvious contradiction of its own financial interests.

Hard Times for Dick’s as Second Amendment Supporters Respond to Company’s Anti-Gun Bent, May 11, 2018

Dick’s opened a new outlet recently in Cedar Park, Texas which is not too far from where I live. I have bought a few things in that store and was contemplating the purchase of a Ruger LC9s (highly concealable 9mm handgun to go with my Texas Concealed Carry Permit). They gave me a “SCORECARD” to keep track of my purchases and win points towards future discounts. Their prices on handguns looked to me to be pretty good and they carried all the latest models.

Unfortunately though I had to modify the “SCORECARD” – see below:

Dick’s Sporting Goods SCORECARD, Modified

Dick’s prices are good, but not any better than at least one other store in Austin, Texas that doesn’t discriminate against Modern Sporting Rifles (an AR-15, for example) and their legal accessories. They also have a pretty good price on the Ruger LC9s. Guess that is where I am going to be shopping for that particular purchase. It sure won’t be at Dick’s!

Here is my advice for Americans who value their right to self defense explicitly recognized in the Constitution of the United States in the 2nd Amendment:

Don’t be a Dick.

Don’t buy from Dick’s Sporting Goods or Field & Stream.

Why I Cancelled My Citi Visa Card

On March 22nd Citibank which issues Citi Visas and Mastercards released a “Commercial Firearms Policy” to announce  unprecedented requirements to force firearms dealers who do business with Citibank to restrict certain sales of firearms and firearms accessories like “high capacity” magazines.

Citibank’s new policy:

“Under this…policy, we will require new retail sector clients or partners to adhere to these best practices: (1) they don’t sell firearms to someone who hasn’t passed a background check, (2) they restrict the sale of firearms for individuals under 21 years of age, and (3) they don’t sell bump stocks or high-capacity magazines. This policy will apply across the firm, including to small business, commercial and institutional clients, as well as credit card partners, whether co-brand or private label. It doesn’t impact the ability of consumers to use their Citi cards at merchants of their choice.”

Just for the record in the vast majority of cases it would be illegal for a licensed firearms dealer to sell a firearm to someone who hasn’t passed an FBI online background check. The only exception I know of, at least in Texas, is a person who holds a state issued concealed carry permit which means they have passed a far more extensive background check than what the FBI conducts.

According to Breitbart it would also require dealers to refuse to sell a gun if an instant background check took more than three business days. The problem is that sometimes people with common names take longer to check. The FBI has to confirm they are not the felon who is on their list who just happens to have the same name. This sometimes takes time to appeal and prove you are not the felon who just happens to have the same name.

Federal law allows sales of firearms to people between18-21 years of age with the required FBI background check. Citibank would like to repeal that right. My son at 18 was old enough to join the Marines and be issued an M16 so I think he was old enough at 18 to buy an AR-15.

Finally they want to stop the sale of “high capacity” magazines which are perfectly legal. High capacity magazines for MSRs (Modern Sporting Rifles) like the AR-15 are not the problem. The problem is a failure to enforce current laws, failure to recognize and deal with severely mentally ill people (like just about all the mass murderers in recent history), and the arsine insistence that we not defend our schools with armed adults. “Gun Free Zones” are an invitation to mass murder. The Israelis learned that a long time ago and now protect their schools and school children “in depth,” to use a military term.

Therefore I cancelled my Costco Citi Visa card today (and cancelled my Costco membership too as Citi is their main card issuer). If you value your right to defend yourself and your family you might want to do the same.